Category: Post-Charge and Trial Issues

District Attorney’s Office, Denver, CO

The People’s Ex Parte Submission & Request for Ex Parte, In Camera Hearing (State of Colorado v. Jason Groshart)

Prosecution’s argument to block discovery of the Forensic Genetic Genealogy (FGG) investigative process in a Colorado sexual assault case that occurred in 2004. The prosecution seeks an ex parte, in camera hearing outside the presence of the defense to present to the court the FGG process and techniques and to respond to concerns or questions held by the court on this topic.
District Attorney’s Office, Denver, CO

State of Colorado v. Steven Cumberbatch – Case Documents

These case documents pertain to the 1994 Colorado murder-sexual offense case, State of Colorado v. Steven Cumberbatch, and collectively outline the parties’ legal positions concerning alleged evidence destruction, due process considerations arising from delayed charging decisions, and the scope of admissible background evidence at trial. The materials include: (1) the prosecution’s response to the defense’s motion to dismiss based on alleged destruction of evidence; (2) the prosecution’s response to the defense’s motion to dismiss due to pre indictment delay; and (3) the prosecution’s motion in limine.
District Attorney’s Office, Denver, CO

People’s Response to Defense Motion to Dismiss for Pre-Indictment Delay (State of Colorado v. Steven Cumberbatch)

Prosecution’s response to the defense’s motion to dismiss the case due to a pre-indictment delay in a Colorado murder-sexual offense case that occurred in 1994. The response addresses the defense’s due process arguments regarding the statute of limitations and the unavailability of witnesses and alternate suspects. The response also noted the advances in forensic techniques that occurred since the date of the incident which enabled investigators to utilize the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS).
District Attorney’s Office, Denver, CO

People’s Motion in Limine (State of Colorado v. Steven Cumberbatch)

Prosecution’s motion in limine in the trial of a Colorado murder-sexual offense that occurred in 1994. The prosecution sought to admit “sanitized” police encounters with the defendant that occurred in Denver during the timeframe prior to the murder to limit any unfairly prejudicial details or facts.
Legal Document Repository

State of Washington v. Terrence Miller – Case Documents

These case documents pertain to the 1972 Washington murder-sexual offense case, State of Washington v. Terrence Miller, and collectively outline the evidentiary disputes central to the case, the parties’ competing positions on the admissibility and reliability of historical forensic evidence, and the investigative basis for the long-delayed charges. The materials include: (1) the prosecution’s response to multiple evidentiary issues raised by the defense; (2) the defense’s trial brief and motions in limine; (3) the defense’s motion to exclude evidence; and (4) the prosecution’s charging affidavit.