Court’s Ruling on Defense Motion to Suppress (State of Idaho v. David Dalrymple)

1) State’s Motion in Limine for Non-Disclosure 2) Memorandum in Support of State’s Motion in Limine for Non-Disclosure 3) State’s Motion to Re-Open Previously Filed and Ruled Upon Motion in Limine for Non-Disclosure 4) State’s Objection and Brief in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Suppress 5) Defense’s Brief in Support of Motion to Suppress 6)...

Prosecution’s response to the defense’s claim of Fourth Amendment violation in an Idaho murder-sexual offense case that occurred in 1982. The prosecution attached, as an exhibit, the Minnesota trial court’s ruling on this issue in State v. Westrom. See Minnesota Supreme Court’s opinion in the Westrom Case, which is consistent with...

Defense’s brief in support of the motion to suppress genetic evidence in an Idaho murder-sexual offense case that occurred in 1982. Defense claims that techniques used to generate a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) profile from the defendant’s hair (located and collected from the crime scene) which was then subjected to...

Prosecution’s follow-up motion to reopen regarding non-disclosure of the Forensic Genetic Genealogy process, and the potential leads it generates, in an Idaho murder-sexual offense case that occurred in 1982. The prosecution raises this motion in light of a subsequent appellate decision State v. Pendleton, 537 P.3d 66 (Idaho 2023) which...

Prosecution’s memorandum in support of the motion in limine for non-disclosure of the Forensic Genetic Genealogy process, and the potential leads it generates, in an Idaho murder-sexual offense case that occurred in 1982...

Prosecution’s motion in limine for non-disclosure of the Forensic Genetic Genealogy process, and the potential leads it generates, in an Idaho murder-sexual offense case that occurred in 1982...